Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
State of the art and recent advancements in the GIS-based approaches for landfill site selection / FIROMSA Bidira, Mateusz JAKUBIAK, Kamil MACIUK // Sustainability [Dokument elektroniczny]. — Czasopismo elektroniczne ; ISSN 2071-1050 . — 2026 — vol. 18 iss. 17 art. no. 9080, s. 1–37. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Bibliogr. s. 29–37, Abstr. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2026-09-03
Autorzy (3)
Słowa kluczowe
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 170234 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2026-09-24 |
| Tekst źródłowy | URL |
| DOI | 10.3390/su18179080 |
| Rok publikacji | 2026 |
| Typ publikacji | przegląd |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
| Creative Commons | |
| Czasopismo/seria | Sustainability |
Abstract
Proper municipal solid waste (MSW) management is vital for mitigating environmental degradation and protecting public health. Landfill site selection remains a complex spatial decision-making challenge, balancing ecological, social, and economic parameters. This study presents a comprehensive systematic review of 175 peer-reviewed articles published between 2016 and 2026, evaluating the evolution of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) frameworks. The findings indicate that road accessibility (93.7%), surface and groundwater protection (91.4%), slope gradients (84.6%), and settlement buffer zones (78.9%) represent the most critical and universally applied siting criteria. Digital Elevation Models (81.9%) and geological maps (57.3%) serve as foundational geospatial datasets. While the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) remains the dominant weighting technique (63.41%), recent trends show an increasing adoption of hybrid multi-criteria models and optimisation algorithms. Geographically, research output is led by India, Iran, and Turkey, peaking significantly in 2025. Crucially, this review exposes prominent methodological shortcomings, notably a heavy reliance on subjective expert validation (73.8%), whereas quantitative validation, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty assessment remain critically underutilised. In contrast to earlier reviews, this review offers a thorough and critical synthesis of GIS- and MCDA-based approaches to landfill site selection by carefully evaluating methodological advancements, examining the advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of current approaches, and incorporating statistical trends with a structured methodological framework. This approach highlights important research gaps and offers evidence-based suggestions for creating more transparent, reliable, and sustainable techniques for landfill site selection by selecting, screening, and including relevant articles. To foster sustainable urban planning, future research must prioritise standardised evaluation frameworks, rigorous uncertainty quantification, and the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning with spatial modelling.
