Szczegóły publikacji

Opis bibliograficzny

AHP in design for Six Sigma project selection / Marcin NAKIELSKI, Grzegorz GINDA // Sustainability [Dokument elektroniczny]. — Czasopismo elektroniczne ; ISSN  2071-1050 . — 2026 — vol. 18 iss. 11 art. no. 5258, s. 1–21. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Bibliogr. s. 19–21, Abstr. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2026-05-23

Autorzy (2)

Słowa kluczowe

MCDADFSSproduct developmentAHPautomotive industrymulti-criteria decision analysisproject selectionanalytic hierarchy processDesign for Six Sigma

Dane bibliometryczne

ID BaDAP168167
Data dodania do BaDAP2026-07-07
Tekst źródłowyURL
DOI10.3390/su18115258
Rok publikacji2026
Typ publikacjiartykuł w czasopiśmie
Otwarty dostęptak
Creative Commons
Czasopismo/seriaSustainability

Abstract

Effective project selection is a critical determinant of success for Design for Six Sigma (DFSS), particularly in automotive environments defined by high technical complexity and constrained resources. Because these selection tasks involve competing priorities, they are fundamentally multi-criteria decision-making (MCDA) problems that directly impact a company’s economic performance. This paper proposes a hybrid decision-support framework that integrates the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with a normalized scoring model. In this approach, classical AHP pairwise comparisons are used to derive consistent criteria weights, while project alternatives are evaluated on a 1–10 normalized scale to ensure the model remains scalable and practical for an industrial setting. The framework was empirically validated through a case study in an automotive company evaluating twelve DFSS project concepts. The results reveal that experts prioritize Product Quality (33%) and Cost/Functionality (33%) above all other factors, with these two criteria accounting for 66% of the total decision weight. Furthermore, the study established classification rules where projects scoring above 7.2 showed high implementation potential, while those below 5.2 were frequently discontinued. This structured approach enables a transparent and justifiable prioritization process that supports economic and operational sustainability by significantly reducing wasted engineering hours and prototype costs.

Publikacje, które mogą Cię zainteresować

artykuł
#169878Data dodania: 8.9.2026
What can AHP/ANP do for SIX SIGMA? : a short literature survey / Marcin NAKIELSKI, Grzegorz GINDA, Chellappa Vigneshkumar // Decision Making in Manufacturing and Services ; ISSN  1896-8325 . — 2025 — vol. 19, s. 59–68. — Bibliogr. s. 67-68, Abstr. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2025-12-30
fragment książki
#87944Data dodania: 23.2.2015
Product and service quality in Six Sigma methodology / Marcin MIGZA // W: MMK 2014 [Dokument elektroniczny] : mezinárodní masarykova konference pro doktorandy a mladé vědecké pracovníky : 15.–19. prosince 2014 : Hradec Králové, Česká republika : sborník příspěvků z mezinárodní vědecké konference, R. 5 = MMK 2014 [Dokument elektroniczny] : international masaryk conference for Ph. D. students and young researchers : December 15–19, 2014, Hradec Králové, The Czech Republic : proceedings of the international scientific conference. — Wersja do Windows. — Dane tekstowe. — [Hradec Králové] : Magnanimitas Assn., [2014]. — 1 dysk optyczny. — e-ISBN: 978-80-87952-07-8. — S. 3035–3039. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader ; napęd CD-ROM. — Bibliogr. s. 3039, Abstr.