Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
Participatory budgeting: data, tools, and analysis / Piotr FALISZEWSKI, Jarosław Flis, Dominik Peters, Grzegorz Pierczyński, Piotr Skowron, Dariusz Stolicki, Stanisław SZUFA, Nimrod Talmon // W: IJCAI-23 [Dokument elektroniczny] : proceedings of the thirty-second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence : Macao, SAR, 19-25 August 2023 / ed. by Edith Elkind. — Wersja do Windows. — Dane tekstowe. — Darmstadt : International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, cop. 2023. — (Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence ; ISSN 1045-0823). — e-ISBN: 978-1-956792-03-4. — S. 2667–2674. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Bibliogr. s. 2674, Abstr. — G. Pierczyński - afiliacja: University of Warsaw
Autorzy (8)
- AGHFaliszewski Piotr
- Flis Jarosław
- Peters Dominik
- Pierczyński Grzegorz
- Skowron Piotr
- Stolicki Dariusz
- AGHSzufa Stanisław
- Talmon Nimrod
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 148801 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2023-10-05 |
| Tekst źródłowy | URL |
| DOI | 10.24963/ijcai.2023/297 |
| Rok publikacji | 2023 |
| Typ publikacji | materiały konferencyjne (aut.) |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
| Konferencja | Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence |
| Czasopismo/seria | Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence |
Abstract
We provide a library of participatory budgeting data (Pabulib) and open source tools (Pabutools and Pabustats) for analysing this data. We analyse how the results of participatory budgeting elections would change if a different selection rule was applied. We provide evidence that the outcomes of the Method of Equal Shares would be considerably fairer than those of the Utilitarian Greedy rule that is currently in use. We also show that the division of the projects into districts and/or categories can in many cases be avoided when using proportional rules. We find that this would increase the overall utility of the voters.