Szczegóły publikacji

Opis bibliograficzny

Religion and attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia among young people in Poland and Norway / Pål Ketil Botvar, Claudia Sarti, Katarzyna Zielińska, Marcin K. ZWIERŻDŻYŃSKI // W: Euthanasia, abortion, death penalty and religion - the right to life and its limitations : international empirical research / eds. Hans-Georg Ziebertz, Francesco Zaccaria. — Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland, cop. 2019. — (Religion and Human Rights ; ISSN 2510-4306 ; vol. 4). — ISBN: 978-3-319-98772-9; e-ISBN: 978-3-319-98773-6. — S. 243–270. — Bibliogr. s. 269–270. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2018-11-17. — A correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98773-6_12

Autorzy (4)

Słowa kluczowe

youthrole of religioncatholiceuthanasiaprotestantabortionreligiosityNorwayhuman rightsPoland

Dane bibliometryczne

ID BaDAP131467
Data dodania do BaDAP2020-12-16
Tekst źródłowyURL
DOI10.1007/978-3-319-98773-6_10
Rok publikacji2019
Typ publikacjifragment książki
Otwarty dostęptak
WydawcaSpringer
Czasopismo/seriaReligion and Human Rights

Abstract

This article compares attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia in two countries with different Christian traditions. Poland is a former communist country with a strong Catholic tradition. Norway is a highly secularized Scandinavian country with a dominating Lutheran Church. The two countries have different legal frameworks regarding abortion and euthanasia. We aim here to investigate the connection between religion and attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia. Our methodological approach is “most different systems design”. If one finds similar patterns in countries with different religious and political cultures, there is reason to believe that the findings will also apply to other countries. Though the two countries differ with respect to political and religious culture, we find interesting similarities between them. In both countries, religiosity has a negative impact on attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia; this means that the most religious people also have the most negative attitudes regarding these issues. Views regarding the role religion should perform in society are also strong predictors of attitudes. In both countries, those who think that church and religion should actively influence society have negative attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia while those who think church and religion should adapt to trends in society support both abortion and euthanasia as a right.

Publikacje, które mogą Cię zainteresować

fragment książki
#131468Data dodania: 16.12.2020
Correction to: Religion and attitudes towards abortion and euthanasia among young people in Poland and Norway / Pål Ketil Botvar, Claudia Sarti, Katarzyna Zielińska, Marcin K. ZWIERŻDŻYŃSKI // W: Euthanasia, abortion, death penalty and religion - the right to life and its limitations : international empirical research / eds. Hans-Georg Ziebertz, Francesco Zaccaria. — Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland, cop. 2019. — (Religion and Human Rights ; ISSN 2510-4306 ; vol. 4). — ISBN: 978-3-319-98772-9; e-ISBN: 978-3-319-98773-6. — S. C1. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2019-02-02. — The updated version of this chapter can be found at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98773-6_10
fragment książki
#149383Data dodania: 27.10.2023
Marketing research project to study the attitudes and preferences of travelers towards an innovative mode of transport in Poland / Ewa PRYMON-RYŚ // W: Proceedings of the 41st International Business Information Management Association conference (IBIMA) [Dokument elektroniczny] : 26-27 June 2023, Granada, Spain : 2025 vision to sustain economic development / ed. Khalid S. Soliman. — Wersja do Windows. — Dane tekstowe. — [Norristown] : International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), cop. 2023. — (Proceedings of the... International Business Information Management Association Conference ; ISSN 2767-9640). — S. 29–35. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Tryb dostępu: https://s.agh.edu.pl/laQ6H [2023-10-10]. — Bibliogr. s. 34–35, Abstr.