Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
Frameworks to identify research gaps, frame research needs, and derive research priorities from evidence syntheses: a scoping review / Omar Dewidara, Mouad Elganga, Martin Ringsten, Miranda Langendam, K. M. Saif-Ur-Rahman, Małgorzata M. Bała, Chiara Arienti, Antonio Bognanni, Andrea J. Darzi, Paweł JEMIOŁO, Sebastian Krawczyk, Stefano G. Lazzarini, Manuel Marques-Cruz, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Getrud J. Mollel, Elena Parmelli, Karen A. Robinson, Bernardo Sousa-Pinto, Waldemar Siemens, Rafael José Vieira, Samuel J. White, Maura Marcucci, Holger J. Schünemann // Journal of Clinical Epidemiology ; ISSN 0895-4356 . — 2026 — vol. 197 art. no. 112342, s. 1–16. — Bibliogr. s. 15–16, Abstr. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2026-05-26. — P. Jemioło - dod. afiliacja: Department of Hygiene and Dietetics, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
Autorzy (23)
- Dewidar Omar
- Elganga Mouad
- Ringsten Martin
- Langendam Miranda
- Saif Ur Rahman K. M.
- Bała Małgorzata Maria
- Arienti Chiara
- Bognanni Antonio
- Darzi Andrea J.
- AGHJemioło Paweł
- Krawczyk Sebastian
- Lazzarini Stefano G.
- Marques-Cruz Manuel
- Meerpohl Joerg J.
- Mollel Getrud J.
- Parmelli Elana
- Robinson Karen A.
- Sousa-Pinto Bernardo
- Siemens Waldemar
- Vieira Rafael José
- White Samuel J.
- Marcucci Maura
- Schünemann Holger J.
Słowa kluczowe
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 168880 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2026-09-01 |
| Tekst źródłowy | URL |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2026.112342 |
| Rok publikacji | 2026 |
| Typ publikacji | przegląd |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
| Czasopismo/seria | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Abstract
Objectives To identify and describe frameworks for systematically identifying research gaps from evidence syntheses, framing research needs, and establishing priorities, with emphasis on their use of GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) certainty of evidence (CoE) domains and evidence-to-decision (EtD) criteria. Study Design and Setting We conducted a scoping review following JBI guidance, searching MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science on July 14, 2025, for publications from 2011 onward. Eligible documents described approaches for identifying research gaps or formulating research needs from systematic reviews or other evidence syntheses, not limited to GRADE. Data were extracted on framework structure, methods for gap identification, use of GRADE CoE to explore nature of the gaps, GRADE EtD to frame needs, and strategies for prioritization. Results Fourteen frameworks from 17 publications were identified. Five frameworks used the Population, Interventions, Comparisons and Outcomes (PICO) approach to characterize research gaps. Six frameworks provided explicit methods to investigate the nature of the gaps, typically through GRADE CoE assessment. None fully integrated the GRADE EtD framework, although some considered selected EtD criteria when framing research needs. Four included methods for prioritizing needs. Conclusion Frameworks to identify research gaps and formulate needs from evidence syntheses are heterogeneous and often lack explicit methods for investigating the nature of the gaps or prioritizing research. This review will inform guidance on how to use GRADE to systematically and transparently inform future research. © 2026 Elsevier Inc.
