Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
Comparison of machine learning models in nonlinear and stochastic signal classification / Elżbieta OLEJARCZYK, Carlo Massaroni // Applied Sciences (Basel) [Dokument elektroniczny]. — Czasopismo elektroniczne ; ISSN 2076-3417 . — 2025 — vol. 20 iss. 15 art. no. 11226, s. 1-21. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Bibliogr. s. 20-21, Abstr. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2025-10-20. — E. Olejarczyk - dod. afiliacja: Nalecz Institute of Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, Polish Academy of Sciences
Autorzy (2)
- AGHOlejarczyk Elżbieta
- Massaroni Carlo
Słowa kluczowe
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 166702 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2026-03-27 |
| Tekst źródłowy | URL |
| DOI | 10.3390/app152011226 |
| Rok publikacji | 2025 |
| Typ publikacji | artykuł w czasopiśmie |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
| Creative Commons | |
| Czasopismo/seria | Applied Sciences (Basel) |
Abstract
This study aims to compare different classifiers in the context of distinguishing two classes of signals: nonlinear electrocardiography (ECG) signals and stochastic artifacts occurring in ECG signals. The ECG signals from a single-lead wearable Movesense device were analyzed with a set of eight features: variance (VAR), three fractal dimension measures (Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD), Katz fractal dimension (KFD), and Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA)), and four entropy measures (approximate entropy (ApEn), sample entropy (SampEn), and multiscale entropy (MSE) for scales 1 and 2). The minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance algorithm was applied for evaluation of feature importance. A broad spectrum of machine learning models was considered for classification. The proposed approach allowed for comparison of classifier features, as well as providing a broader insight into the characteristics of the signals themselves. The most important features for classification were VAR, DFA, ApEn, and HFD. The best performance among 34 classifiers was obtained using an optimized RUSBoosted Trees ensemble classifier (sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 99.8, 73.7%, 99.8, and 74.3, respectively). The accuracy of the Movesense device was very high (99.6%). Moreover, the multifractality of ECG during sleep was observed in the relationship between SampEn (or ApEn) and MSE.
