Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
Evaluating HAS and low-latency streaming algorithms for enhanced QoE / Syed UDDIN, Michał GREGA, Mikołaj LESZCZUK, Waqas ur Rahman // Electronics [Dokument elektroniczny]. — Czasopismo elektroniczne ; ISSN 2079-9292. — 2025 — vol. 14 iss. 13 art. no. 2587, s. 1–24. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Bibliogr. s. 22–24, Abstr. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2025-06-26
Autorzy (4)
- AGHUddin Syed
- AGHGrega Michał
- AGHLeszczuk Mikołaj
- Ur Rahman Waqas
Słowa kluczowe
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 160704 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2025-07-01 |
| Tekst źródłowy | URL |
| DOI | 10.3390/electronics14132587 |
| Rok publikacji | 2025 |
| Typ publikacji | artykuł w czasopiśmie |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
| Creative Commons | |
| Czasopismo/seria | Electronics |
Abstract
The demand for multimedia traffic over the Internet is exponentially growing. HTTP adaptive streaming (HAS) is the leading video delivery system that delivers high-quality video to the end user. The adaptive bitrate (ABR) algorithms running on the HTTP client select the highest feasible video quality by adjusting the quality according to the fluctuating network conditions. Recently, low-latency ABR algorithms have been introduced to reduce the end-to-end latency commonly experienced in HAS. However, a comprehensive study of the low-latency algorithms remains limited. This paper investigates the effectiveness of low-latency streaming algorithms in maintaining a high quality of experience (QoE) while minimizing playback delay. We evaluate these algorithms in the context of both Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) and the Common Media Application Format (CMAF), with a particular focus on the impact of chunked encoding and transfer mechanisms on the QoE. We perform both objective as well as subjective evaluations of low-latency algorithms and compare their performance with traditional DASH-based ABR algorithms across multiple QoE metrics, various network conditions, and diverse content types. The results demonstrate that low-latency algorithms consistently deliver high video quality across various content types and network conditions, whereas the performance of the traditional adaptive bitrate (ABR) algorithms exhibit performance variability under fluctuating network conditions and diverse content characteristics. Although traditional ABR algorithms download higher-quality segments in stable network environments, their effectiveness significantly declines under unstable conditions. Furthermore, the low-latency algorithms maintained high user experience regardless of segment duration. In contrast, the performance of traditional algorithms varied significantly with changes in segment duration. In summary, the results underscore that no single algorithm consistently achieves optimal performance across all experimental conditions. Performance varies depending on network stability, content characteristics, and segment duration, highlighting the need for adaptive strategies that can dynamically respond to varying streaming environments.
