Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
Elevation accuracy of forest road maps derived from aerial imaging, airborne laser scanning and mobile laser scanning data / Miroslav Kardoš, Ivan Sačkov, Julián Tomaštík, Izabela BASISTA, Łukasz Borowski, Michal Ferenčík // Forests [Dokument elektroniczny]. - Czasopismo elektroniczne ; ISSN 1999-4907. — 2024 — vol. 15 iss. 5 art. no. 840, s. 1–15. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Bibliogr. s. 13–15, Abstr. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2024-05-10
Autorzy (6)
- Kardoš Miroslav
- Sačkov Ivan
- Tomaštík Julián
- AGHBasista Izabela
- Borowski Łukasz
- Ferenčík Michal
Słowa kluczowe
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 154616 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2024-07-23 |
| Tekst źródłowy | URL |
| DOI | 10.3390/f15050840 |
| Rok publikacji | 2024 |
| Typ publikacji | artykuł w czasopiśmie |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
| Creative Commons | |
| Czasopismo/seria | Forests |
Abstract
Forest road maps are a fundamental source of information for the sustainable management, protection, and public utilization of forests. However, the precision of these maps is crucial to their use. In this context, we assessed and compared the elevation accuracy of terrain on three forest road surfaces (i.e., asphalt, concrete, and stone), which were derived based on data from three remote sensing technologies (i.e., aerial imaging, airborne laser scanning, and mobile laser scanning) using five geospatial techniques (i.e., inverse distance; natural neighbor; and conversion by average, maximal, and minimal elevation value). Specifically, the elevation accuracy was assessed based on 700 points at which elevation was measured in the field, and these elevations were extracted from fifteen derived forest road maps with a resolution of 0.5 m. The highest precision was found on asphalt roads derived from mobile laser scanning data (RMSE from ±0.01 m to ±0.04 m) and airborne laser scanning data (RMSE from ±0.03 m to ±0.04 m). On the other hand, the lowest precision was found on all roads derived from aerial imaging data (RMSE from ±0.11 m to ±0.23 m). Furthermore, we found significant differences in elevation between the measured and derived terrains. However, the differences in elevation between specific techniques, such as inverse distance, natural neighbor, and conversion by average, were mostly random. Moreover, we found that airborne and mobile laser scanning technologies provided terrain on concrete and stone roads with random elevation differences. In these cases, it is possible to replace a specific technique or technology with one that is similar without significantly decreasing the elevation accuracy (α = 0.05).
