Szczegóły publikacji

Opis bibliograficzny

Autorzy (6)

• Woś Bartłomiej
• Sierka Edyta
• Kompała-Bąba Agnieszka
• Bierza Wojciech
• AGHChodak Marcin
• Pietrzykowski Marcin

Słowa kluczowe

Dane bibliometryczne

ID BaDAP	152508
Data dodania do BaDAP	2024-04-19
Tekst źródłowy	URL
DOI	10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171612
Rok publikacji	2024
Typ publikacji	artykuł w czasopiśmie
Otwarty dostęp
Czasopismo/seria	Science of the Total Environment

Abstract

Various plant functional groups (PFGs) used in the reclamation of post-mining heaps may differ in their nutrient uptake efficiency and thus in their effect on the ecosystem development. The effect of PFGs may be additionally modified by the applied reclamation measures such as e.g. topsoiling. In this study we compared the nutrient uptake efficiencies and plant stoichiometry for two PFGs (grasses and forbs) growing on the sites reclaimed by applying topsoil (TS) and unreclaimed sites on carboniferous bare rock (BR) in hard coal spoil heap in Upper Silesia (southern Poland). Basic soil parameters, including pH, texture, soil organic carbon, and nutrients (N, P, K, Ca, and Mg), were measured, and the aboveground plant biomass and nutrient content in plant tissue were determined. Forbs were characterized by a larger biomass and higher nutrient concentrations (except for P) than grasses. The TS treatment supported higher concentrations of N and P in plant tissues but not to the level ensuring more significant primary biomass production. The nutrient concentration and elemental stoichiometry in plant tissue indicated that N was the primary limiting element. However, the major growth limitation for N-fixing forbs was from P. Forbs were much more efficient in nutrient uptake than grasses, independent of the reclamation treatment. Therefore, they stimulate nutrient cycling in the restored ecosystems more than grasses. © 2024

Publikacje, które mogą Cię zainteresować