Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
HRI in the AGH Space Systems planetary rover team: a study of long-term human-robot cooperation / Nina Bażela, Paweł Graczak // W: Social robots in social institutions : proceedings of Robophilosophy 2022 : [5th biennial Robophilosophy conference series : Helsinki, Finland, 16–19 August 2022] / eds. Raul Hakli, Pekka Mäkelä, Johanna Seibt. — Amsterdam : IOS Press, cop. 2022, published 2023. — (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications ; ISSN 0922-6389 ; vol. 366). — ISBN: 978-1-64368-374-4; e-ISBN: 978-1-64368-375-1. — S. 361–370. — Bibliogr., Abstr. — N. Bażela, P. Graczak - dod. afiliacja: AGH Space Systems Student Association
Autorzy (2)
Słowa kluczowe
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 148562 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2023-11-10 |
| DOI | 10.3233/FAIA220636 |
| Rok publikacji | 2023 |
| Typ publikacji | materiały konferencyjne (aut.) |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
| Wydawca | IOS Press |
| Czasopismo/seria | Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications |
Abstract
Building relationships and developing successful cooperation in human-robot teams has been an object of research for several years now, yet the studies of long-term relationships in such teams could still be considered sparse. The presented paper is based on a case study of the long-term relationship between a student construction team, AGH Space Systems, and their creation: Kalman, an autonomous rover designed for assisting a human astronaut. The research aimed to measure the level of trust towards the rover among the members of the team and to explore potential factors that could influence it. The adequacy of calling the rover a ‘social robot’, despite its lack of functionalities for social interactions, was also evaluated.Results showed the average level of trust was relatively similar among the team members. The only measured factor which showed a moderate, negative correlation with the subjects’ level of trust was the amount of sleep they had the previous night. Based on the conducted observations it was concluded Kalman can be considered a social robot, at least according to some definitions, due to the social context it operates in – the team’s willingness to consider it a partially conscious team member.