Szczegóły publikacji

Opis bibliograficzny

Autorzy (5)

• Borowski Łukasz
• AGHKudrys Jacek
• Kubicki Bartosz
• Slámová Martina
• AGHMaciuk Kamil

Słowa kluczowe

Dane bibliometryczne

ID BaDAP	140922
Data dodania do BaDAP	2022-07-07
Tekst źródłowy	URL
DOI	10.3390/rs14133226
Rok publikacji	2022
Typ publikacji	artykuł w czasopiśmie
Otwarty dostęp
Creative Commons
Czasopismo/seria	Remote Sensing

Abstract

Changes of the antenna models on permanent global navigation satellite system (GNSS) stations can lead to jumps and discontinuities in the coordinate time series. In this paper, the results of research on the adequacy of the antenna phase centre corrections (PCC) variations are presented by analysing its component—the antennas’ phase centre offset (PCO). For this purpose, height differences were determined using different and independent methods: EUREF Permanent Network (EPN) combined solutions, Precise Point Positioning (PPP), and the single baseline solution. The results of GNSS processing were referenced to direct geometric levelling outputs. The research was conducted only within the global positioning system (GPS) system due to the compatibility of one of the receivers, and the experiment was based on a comparison of the height differences between four GNSS antennas located on the roof of a building: two permanent station antennas and two auxiliary points. The antennas were located at similar heights; precise height differences were determined by geometric levelling, both at the beginning and the end of the session. Post-processing was conducted with the use of the GPS system, precise ephemeris, the adopted antenna correction model, and a zero-elevation mask. For one of the antennas, a change of the antenna characteristic model from IGS08 to IGS14 leads to an 8-mm difference in height. Older antennas used in the national (or transnational) permanent network need individual PCC.

Publikacje, które mogą Cię zainteresować