Szczegóły publikacji

Opis bibliograficzny

Autorzy (4)

• AGHJakubowski Jakub
• AGHStanisz Przemysław
• Bobek Szymon
• Nalepa Grzegorz

Słowa kluczowe

Dane bibliometryczne

ID BaDAP	140689
Data dodania do BaDAP	2022-07-04
DOI	10.1007/978-3-031-08760-8_40
Rok publikacji	2022
Typ publikacji	materiały konferencyjne (aut.)
Otwarty dostęp
Wydawca	Springer
Konferencja	22nd International Conference on Computational Science
Czasopismo/seria	Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Abstract

Extensive research on machine learning models, which in the majority are black-boxes, created a great need for the development of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods. Complex machine learning (ML) models usually require an external explanation method to understand their decisions. The interpretation of the model predictions are crucial in many fields, i.e., predictive maintenance, where it is not only required to evaluate the state of an asset, but also to determine the root causes of the potential failure. In this work, we present a comparison of state-of-the-art ML models and XAI methods, which we used for the prediction of the RUL of aircraft turbofan engines. We trained five different models on the C-MAPSS dataset and used SHAP and LIME to assign numerical importance to the features. We have compared the results of explanations using stability and consistency metrics and evaluated the explanations qualitatively by visual inspection. The obtained results indicate that SHAP method outperforms other methods in the fidelity of explanations. We observe that there exist substantial differences in the explanations depending on the selection of a model and XAI method, thus we find a need for further research in XAI field.

Publikacje, które mogą Cię zainteresować