Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
Monofacial and bifacial micro PV installation as element of energy transition – the case of Poland / Piotr Olczak, Małgorzata Olek, Dominika MATUSZEWSKA, Artur Dyczko, Tomasz Mania // Energies [Dokument elektroniczny]. — Czasopismo elektroniczne ; ISSN 1996-1073. — 2021 — vol. 14 iss. 2 art. no. 499, s. 1–22. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Bibliogr. s. 20–22, Abstr. — Publikacja dostępna online od: 2021-01-18
Autorzy (5)
- Olczak Piotr
- Olek Małgorzata
- AGHMatuszewska Dominika
- Dyczko Artur
- Mania Tomasz
Słowa kluczowe
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 132211 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2021-01-22 |
| Tekst źródłowy | URL |
| DOI | 10.3390/en14020499 |
| Rok publikacji | 2021 |
| Typ publikacji | artykuł w czasopiśmie |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
| Creative Commons | |
| Czasopismo/seria | Energies |
Abstract
The several government subsidies available in Poland contributed to an increased interest in PV installations. Installed PV capacity increased from 100 MW in 2016 up to 2682.7 MW in July 2020. In 2019 alone, 104,000 microinstallations (up to 50 kWp) were installed in Poland. The paper determines the energy gain and the associated reduction of CO2 emissions for two types of solar installation located in Poland. The monofacial solar modules with a power of 5.04 kWp (located in Leki) and bifacial solar modules with a power of 6.1 kWp (located in Bydgoszcz). Both installations use mono-crystalline Si-based 1st generation PV cells. With comparable insolation, a bifacial installation produces approx. 10% (for high insolation) to 28% (for low insolation) more energy than a monofacial PV installation. Avoided annual CO2 emission in relation to the installation capacity ranges from 0.58 to 0.64 Mg/kWp for monofacial and from 0.68 to 0.74 Mg/kWp for bifacial and is on average approx. 16% higher for bifacial installations. Cost-benefit analyses were made. For different electricity prices, the NPV for monofacial and bifacial was determined.
