Szczegóły publikacji
Opis bibliograficzny
The use of principal component analysis for the assessment of spatial variability of curative waters from Busko-Zdrój and Solec-Zdrój Region (Poland) – preliminary results / K. WĄTOR, E. KMIECIK, I. Lipiec // W: New Technologies in Water Sector [Dokument elektroniczny] : 10th Eastern European Young Water Professionals Conference : 7-12 May 2018, Zagreb, Croatia : conference proceedings / ed. Maryna Feierabend, [et al.]. — Wersja do Windows. — Dane tekstowe. — Zagreb : [s. n.], 2018. — S. 209–215. — Wymagania systemowe: Adobe Reader. — Tryb dostępu: http://iwa-ywp.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Conference-Proce... [2018-06-07]. — Bibliogr. s. 214–215, Abstr.
Autorzy (3)
- AGHWątor Katarzyna
- AGHKmiecik Ewa
- Lipiec Iwona
Słowa kluczowe
Dane bibliometryczne
| ID BaDAP | 114342 |
|---|---|
| Data dodania do BaDAP | 2018-06-07 |
| Rok publikacji | 2018 |
| Typ publikacji | materiały konferencyjne (aut.) |
| Otwarty dostęp |  |
Abstract
In Busko-Zdroj and Solec-Zdroj curative water with different concentration of sulphur(II) compounds are exploited. In this paper water from 14 intakes was considered. The analysed waters are chloride-sodium, sulphide, iodide (Cl-Na, S, I) or chloride-sodium, sulphide waters (Cl-Na, S) and are associated especially with deep circulation system (Jurassic limestones) or shallow circulation system mostly connected with Cretaceous formations (marls and limestones of Senonian and sands and sandstones of Cenomanian). Some of them are exploited from different stratigraphic unit. The aim of presented researches was to achieve the similarities between curative waters samples from different geological formation. Principal component analysis was used to assess the similarities between samples of curative waters collected from the intakes examined. Two principal components were extracted. The analysis indicated that there is a difference between chemical composition of water taken from different stratigraphy. Water from Jurassic limestones is characterized by the highest value of component 1. Water samples from Cretaceous formations of Cenomanian and Senonian are similar and not to change much from water exploited from Neogene, Cretaceous and Jurassic. There is observed a small difference for water intakes from Neogene and Cretaceous. However these differences results mostly from component 2 value.
